<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are People Rejected by eHarmony?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/2009/09/22/why-are-people-rejected-by-eharmony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/2009/09/22/why-are-people-rejected-by-eharmony/</link>
	<description>Getting on Track with Online Dating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/2009/09/22/why-are-people-rejected-by-eharmony/comment-page-1/#comment-13564</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/?p=428#comment-13564</guid>
		<description>Scott - I&#039;m glad to hear the guide has been helpful. A little surprised but definitely not chagrined! 

I was actually wondering about the size of the user-base at CompatiblePartners. It seemed to me that if a company were intentionally excluding me but then made a service so that I could be included, I might not be inclined to use that service! Especially considering it took a lawsuit to get to that point.

Thanks a lot for your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; I&#8217;m glad to hear the guide has been helpful. A little surprised but definitely not chagrined! </p>
<p>I was actually wondering about the size of the user-base at CompatiblePartners. It seemed to me that if a company were intentionally excluding me but then made a service so that I could be included, I might not be inclined to use that service! Especially considering it took a lawsuit to get to that point.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/2009/09/22/why-are-people-rejected-by-eharmony/comment-page-1/#comment-13562</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littleredrails.com/blog/?p=428#comment-13562</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a gay man and have found your online dating guide very helpful. I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ll be happy or chagrined by that.  But honestly a lot of this information is still very applicable to those seeking a committed same-sex relationship.  People are people all the same.

Personally I wouldn&#039;t use the site CompatiblePartners. This is because I spent 15+ years (from the time I was around 10 to my late 20s) trying NOT to be gay.  At a point you have to accept who you are, rather than listening to an outsider who says they know more about you than you yourself do.. I just wouldn&#039;t trust someone who claimed to know more about me than I do, and have them fix me up on successful dates.  Plus I have doubts about the size of their user base.

For gay men looking for a relationship, I&#039;d recommend http://lovetastic.com .  It does not have the personality test stuff but has many &quot;getting to know&quot; kinds of questions in the profiles. It&#039;s a site focused on finding other people who are interested in a relationship rather than the overt sexuality on many gay sites.  It&#039;s also written in Rails, is beautifully simple, and takes its relationship-approach very seriously (and actively removes accounts that violate their guidelines).

I&#039;ve noticed trends towards people there wanting more than superficial things. for example, same-sex people wanting to get married (not it&#039;s not just to prove a point).  There are articles such as http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/08/BAG6RNEKBM1.DTL in the San Francisco Chronicle that talk about the trend toward taking relationships more seriously.  I think these trends will only get bigger over time and are very healthy in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a gay man and have found your online dating guide very helpful. I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ll be happy or chagrined by that.  But honestly a lot of this information is still very applicable to those seeking a committed same-sex relationship.  People are people all the same.</p>
<p>Personally I wouldn&#8217;t use the site CompatiblePartners. This is because I spent 15+ years (from the time I was around 10 to my late 20s) trying NOT to be gay.  At a point you have to accept who you are, rather than listening to an outsider who says they know more about you than you yourself do.. I just wouldn&#8217;t trust someone who claimed to know more about me than I do, and have them fix me up on successful dates.  Plus I have doubts about the size of their user base.</p>
<p>For gay men looking for a relationship, I&#8217;d recommend <a href="http://lovetastic.com" rel="nofollow">http://lovetastic.com</a> .  It does not have the personality test stuff but has many &#8220;getting to know&#8221; kinds of questions in the profiles. It&#8217;s a site focused on finding other people who are interested in a relationship rather than the overt sexuality on many gay sites.  It&#8217;s also written in Rails, is beautifully simple, and takes its relationship-approach very seriously (and actively removes accounts that violate their guidelines).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed trends towards people there wanting more than superficial things. for example, same-sex people wanting to get married (not it&#8217;s not just to prove a point).  There are articles such as <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/08/BAG6RNEKBM1.DTL" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/08/BAG6RNEKBM1.DTL</a> in the San Francisco Chronicle that talk about the trend toward taking relationships more seriously.  I think these trends will only get bigger over time and are very healthy in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.littleredrails.com @ 2010-07-31 04:18:04 by W3 Total Cache -->